|
Unemployment Insurance
Web Library Topic -
Health

Statute
§ 8‑73‑108(4)(b), C.R.S.
2005
(4) An individual separated from a job shall be given a full award of
benefits if any of the following reasons and pertinent conditions
related thereto are determined by the division to have existed. The
determination of whether or not the separation from employment shall
result in a full award of benefits shall be the responsibility of the
division. The following reasons shall be considered, along with any
other factors that may be pertinent to such determination:
(b)(I) The health of the worker is such that the worker is separated
from his or her employment and must refrain from working for a period of
time that exceeds the greater of the employer's medical leave of absence
policy or the provisions of the federal “Family and Medical Leave Act of
1993”, if applicable, or the worker's health is such that the worker
must seek a new occupation, or the health of the worker or the worker's
spouse or dependent child is such that the worker must leave the
vicinity of the worker's employment; except that, if the health of the
worker or the worker's spouse or dependent child has caused the
separation from work, the worker, in order to be entitled to a full
award, must have complied with the following requirements: Informed the
worker's employer in writing, if the employer has posted or given actual
advance notice of this writing requirement, of the condition of the
worker's health or the health of the worker's spouse or dependent child
prior to separation from employment and allowed the employer the
opportunity to make reasonable accommodations for the worker's
condition; substantiated the cause by a competent written medical
statement issued by a licensed practicing physician prior to the date of
separation from employment when so requested by the employer prior to
the date of separation from employment or within a reasonable period
thereafter; submitted himself or herself or the worker's spouse or
dependent child to an examination by a licensed practicing physician
selected and paid by the interested employer when so requested by the
employer prior to the date of separation from employment or within a
reasonable period thereafter; or provided the division, when so
requested, with a written medical statement issued by a licensed
practicing physician. For purposes of providing the medical statement or
submitting to an examination for an employer, “a reasonable period
thereafter” shall include the time before adjudication by either a
deputy or referee of the division. An award of benefits pursuant to this
subparagraph (I) shall include benefits to a worker who, either
voluntarily or involuntarily, is separated from employment because of
pregnancy and who otherwise satisfies the requirements of this
subparagraph (I).
(II) In the event of an injury or sudden illness of the worker which
would preclude verbal or written notification of the employer prior to
such occurrence, the failure of the worker to notify the employer prior
to such occurrence will not in itself constitute a reason for the denial
of benefits if the worker has notified the employer at the earliest
practicable time after such occurrence. Such notice shall be given no
later than two working days following such occurrence unless the
worker's physician provides a written statement to the employer within
one week of the employer's request that the worker's condition made
giving such notice impracticable and substantiating the illness or
injury.
(III) Any physician who makes or is present at any examination
required under these provisions shall testify as to the results of his
examination; except that no such physician shall be required to disclose
any confidential communication imparted to him for the purpose of
treatment which is not necessary to a proper understanding of the case.
(IV) The off-the-job or on-the-job use of not medically prescribed
intoxicating beverages or controlled substances, as defined in section
12-22-303 (7), C.R.S., may be reason for a determination for a full
award pursuant to this paragraph (b), but only if:
(A) The worker has declared to the division that he or she is
addicted to intoxicating beverages or controlled substances;
(B) The worker has substantiated the addiction by a competent written
medical statement issued by a physician licensed to practice medicine
pursuant to article 36 of title 12, C.R.S., or has substantiated the
successful completion of, or ongoing participation in, a treatment
program as described in sub-subparagraph (C) of this subparagraph (IV)
within four weeks of the claimant's admission. Such substantiation shall
be in writing to the division and signed by an authorized representative
of the approved treatment program.
(C) A worker who is not affiliated with an approved treatment program
must present to the division within four weeks after the date of the
medical statement referred to in sub-subparagraph (B) of this
subparagraph (IV), substantiation of registration in a program of
corrective action that will commence within four weeks after the date of
the medical statement and that is provided by an approved private
treatment facility or an approved public treatment facility as defined
in section 25-1-302 (2) or (3), C.R.S., or by an alcoholics anonymous
program. Such substantiation shall be in writing to the division and
signed by an authorized representative of the approved treatment
program.
Cases
Andersen
v. Industrial Commission,
167 Colo. 281, 447 P.2d 221 (1968)
There is no requirement that a claimant be advised
to quit by a physician in order to be entitled to unemployment
benefits; rather, a medical statement is only required if the
employer requires or requests one according to the terms of the
statute.
Savio House v. Dennis,
665 P.2d 141 (Colo. 1983)
Evidence of causation in a workers' compensation
case was not limited to medical testimony or evidence; the
claimant's testimony as to her condition was sufficient to support
an award of benefits.
Frontier Airlines v. Industrial Commission,
734 P.2d 142 (Colo. App. 1986)
Claimants who were on mandatory leave from their
jobs as flight attendants due to pregnancy were "separated" from
employment, even if the separation was only partial, and the
employer's continuation of "employee benefits" to the claimants did
not preclude a determination that the claimants were separated from
employment. Further, § 8‑73‑108(4)(b)(I)
is an exception to the to the general rule in Sec. 8-73-108(1)(a)
that claimants must be unemployed through no fault of their own, and
thus the claimants did not have to show they became pregnant
through no fault of their own.
Public Service Company of Colorado v. Ingle, 794 P.2d 1374 (Colo.
App. 1990)
In order to be entitled to unemployment benefits for
having to seek a new occupation because of health reasons
under § 8‑73‑108(4)(b)(I),
a claimant must be required to seek a new line of work, not simply
another job. Also, if the employer fails to ask for medical
documentation to substantiate the cause of the claimant's
resignation, the claimant is not precluded from being awarded
unemployment benefits for failing to provide that information.
Nelson v.
Industrial Claim Appeals Office,
826 P.2d 436 (Colo. App. 1992)
The claimant and his wife both had significant
medical problems, and both were covered under the wife's insurance
plan. The wife's employer required her to transfer to
California, and the claimant quit his job in Colorado to move with
her so that they could maintain their insurance coverage. As
there was no evidence the couple's medical problems were
work-related or that anything in the vicinity of their jobs in
Colorado contributed to their medical conditions, and there was no
indication that the medical treatment in Colorado was inadequate,
the court held that the the claimant quit for financial rather than
health reasons and denied unemployment benefits.
Hodges v.
Canon Lodge Medical Investors, Ltd.,
879 P.2d 476, (Colo. App. 1994)
Where the claimant has informed the employer of his
or her health condition, it is not required that the claimant
specifically inform the employer that the health condition is the
cause of the claimant's resignation.
Back to Top |
Library Index | ICAO
Home Page |
CDLE
Home Page
|